Language selection

Search

Gender equality and empowerment measurement tool Part 3: Reporting guide

PDF Version (2.00 MB)

On this page

In this guide, you will find information on why communicating the results of your data collection is important and instructions to help you analyze, synthesize and report your findings using two templates that are provided: a project report template and a synthesis report template. We also explain the significance and potential outputs and knowledge mobilization strategies that can be used as a result of the reporting process. Once you complete your data collection activities (i.e., focus group discussions and any interviews with project partners), you should have all the information you need to prepare your final reports.

As discussed in Part 1: Training Guide and Part 2: Facilitator’s Guide, feminist methodology uses participatory and inclusive data collection methods to capture the rich and contextualized details of participants’ experiences. This qualitative information can help to understand whether and how a project was successful in achieving gender equality and empowerment outcomes from the perspective of the project participants. Information collected through the GEM Tool can be useful for a wide range of outputs and knowledge mobilization activities from social media engagement to case studies and vignettes. The findings can also provide opportunities for project participants to reflect more deeply on their experiences, and to learn with and from each other during the focus groups.

As you begin to prepare your final reports, be sure to think about how this information can be shared most effectively with project participants and partner communities. The reporting process outlined below allows you to summarize data from individual focus groups, or across multiple focus groups and projects, in order to provide a broader overview and analysis of gender equality and empowerment results.

Instructions for Completing the Project Report

Guidelines for summarizing and analyzing focus group data

Box 3.1: Quality over quantity in project reports

The focus group discussions will provide a lot of rich qualitative information, and you need to ensure this does not get lost in the collation of data and responses. For example, there is the potential for misinterpretation of results if the majority of participants report that a project has had positive gender impacts and only one or two individuals report negative gender impacts. That negative impact could outweigh the positive benefits, particularly if those reporting it are already among the most vulnerable. 

Box 3.2: Using quotes, examples and stories effectively in your reports

How to identify a helpful quote: A helpful quote explains the significance of an experience emerging from the project in a profound and impactful way. It is a way of elaborating on general findings while including the voices of participants and sharing their experiences in their own words.

What makes a strong example: A strong example provides an illustrative summary of what you heard. If you don’t have a helpful quote, a strong example can demonstrate the significance of an experience or set of observations drawing on, but paraphrasing, some of the quotes shared by the participants.

How to write a compelling story: A compelling story gives insight into the successes, issues or concerns raised by the participants. It is equally descriptive and analytical: it describes how the project affected the project participants and or community members, and explains the significance or impact in relation to broader issues or challenges (such as power relations, changes in attitudes and behaviours, societal pressures and or new opportunities emerging as a result of the project).

Project Report Template

Date of report:
Name of project:
Location (country, region):
Implementing partner(s):
Number of focus group participants (broken down by gender):
Number of project partner interviews (broken down by gender):

Brief project description (75 words maximum):

  1. Defining gender equality and empowerment (250 words maximum)

Describe how participants defined gender equality and empowerment, focusing on what were the common examples or definitions. Offer any analysis or description of the tone of the conversation, any debates that took place, or any relevant information about the local context and how this informed participants’ understanding and definitions.

  1. Gender impacts by category (500 words maximum, or approximately 100 words per category)

Tally the gender impact ratings for each category and indicate the total number of participant responses in brackets next to each rating option (i.e., no gender impacts, negative gender impacts, mixed gender impacts, and positive gender impacts). Elaborate on the quantitative ratings by providing specific examples from the focus group discussion.

Economic
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion.

Knowledge
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion.

Physical Security
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion.

Self-Confidence
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion:

Social
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion:

Insert any other categories identified by participants
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion:

  1. Support for gender equality and women’s empowerment (250 words maximum)

What are 2 or 3 themes that emerged around support for gender equality and women’s empowerment in the project environment? Provide 1-2 quotes, examples or stories that represent each theme. You may want to organize this into themes that emerged specific to individual, household, community and or structural supports.

  1. Barriers for gender equality and women’s empowerment (250 words maximum)

What are 2 or 3 themes that emerged around barriers to gender equality and women’s empowerment in the project environment? Provide 1-2 quotes, examples or stories that represent each theme. You may want to organize this into themes that emerged specific to individual, household, community and or structural barriers.

  1. Recommendations (250 words maximum)

Based on your discussions with participants and project partners, identify 2 or 3 key recommendations for improving the project’s gender equality and empowerment outcomes. These recommendations can include examples of ways to improve project success through an intersectional lens, or in terms of addressing broader social challenges or improving support structures.

Include an appendix for each of the following:

Instructions for completing the synthesis report

If you collected data for more than one project using the GEM Tool, you might wish to prepare a synthesis report to summarize and aggregate your findings across several projects and data collection activities. A synthesis report can provide an important overview and analysis of gender equality and empowerment experiences and results at the local, regional or country level.

Guidelines for synthesizing data collected for multiple projects:

Synthesis Report Template

Country:
Total number of projects evaluated:
Total number of focus group participants (broken down by gender):
Total number of project partner interviews (broken down by gender):
Data collection time period: ddmmyyyy – ddmmyyyy

  1. Defining gender equality and empowerment (250 words maximum)

Summarize how participants defined gender equality and empowerment across the different projects and focus groups, focusing on what were the common examples or definitions. Offer any relevant information about the local context and how this informed participants’ understanding and definitions.

  1. Gender impacts by category (500 words maximum, or approximately 100 words per category)

Tally the total gender impact ratings for each category across all projects, and indicate the total number of participant responses in brackets next to each rating option (i.e. no gender impacts, negative gender impacts, mixed gender impacts, and positive gender impacts). Elaborate on the quantitative ratings by providing common themes and examples shared by participants across the projects.

Economic
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)
Elaborate with common themes and examples from the discussion.

Knowledge
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with common themes and examples from the discussion.

Physical Security
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with common themes and examples from the discussion.

Self-Confidence
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with common themes and examples from the discussion.

Social
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with common themes and examples from the discussion.

Insert any other categories identified by participants
No gender impacts (#)
Negative gender impacts (#)
Mixed gender impacts (#)
Positive gender impacts (#)

Elaborate with specific examples from the discussion.

  1. Support for gender equality and women’s empowerment (250 words maximum)

What were some of the common supports for gender equality and empowerment highlighted across the projects? Identify and summarize common themes, as well as any unique supports highlighted by members of marginalized groups. You may want to organize this into themes that emerged specific to individual, household, community and or structural supports.

  1. Barriers to gender equality and women’s empowerment (250 words maximum)

What were some of the common barriers for gender equality and empowerment highlighted across the projects? Identify and summarize common themes here, as well as any unique barriers highlighted by members of marginalized groups. You may want to organize this into themes that emerged specific to individual, household, community and or structural barriers.

  1. Considerations for future gender equality and empowerment programming in this region (125 words maximum)

Based on the data collected with all project participants and partner staff across projects, share suggestions for improving gender equality programming and or the promotion of empowerment in this region.

Sharing results with participants

As outlined in Part 1: Training Guide, feminist research is not extractive; it is committed to knowledge sharing and reciprocity. In order to ensure accountability to participants, feminist research must strive to benefit the community. Therefore, an important step in the GEM Tool is to share the results of your research with any focus group participants and project partners who participated in the data collection process. This can be done in a number of ways and the ideal method will depend on the local context and community in question. For example, you could share an electronic or printed copy of the final report, but this will not be useful for participants with low literacy or who do not have internet access. Another option is to facilitate a group or community feedback session, to share the findings of the report and the results of the data collection. It is important to always be mindful of language and translation of any materials.

There are many innovative and creative ways to share results with participants. The key consideration is to think through what information would be most valuable and useful for participants, and what is the best way to deliver that information in the local context. Work with the local project partners to arrange for the dissemination of the evaluation results to participants and community members.

Creating outputs from feminist research

In addition to sharing the results of the research with project participants, the findings from data collected using the GEM Tool can also be used for broader knowledge mobilization. The qualitative data generated from feminist research provide rich stories and examples that can be used in the creation of different outputs such as vignettes, blog posts, short films, comic strips, digital campaigns, etc. and can be shared widely on social media, within and between organizations, and with funding agencies.

The information and findings arising from the GEM Tool can provide compelling insights into the ways that gender and power operate in partner communities, and inspiring examples of the strategies used by project participants to overcome marginalization and discrimination resulting from patriarchy and other systems of oppression. It can be used to capture diverse stories, examples and experiences that complement more quantitative information and reporting, and ensure that people (project participants and partner communities) remain at the center of our priorities in research and data collection.

Related Links

Report a problem on this page
Please select all that apply:

Thank you for your help!

You will not receive a reply. For enquiries, please contact us.

Date Modified: